Recent content by shadow123

the tournament format you're describing is pretty niche even at sites that do run tournaments. most just do freerolls or leaderboard competitions. the fixed-spin buy-in tournaments were kind of a videoslots specialty might be worth asking in the casino reviews section if anyone knows alternatives

smart business from the operators though. keeps players in the app longer, more touchpoints, more bets placed incidentally. they wouldn't be doing it if it didn't move the numbers. so real question is whether it actually changes bettin behavior or just layers cosmetic stuff on top of what people...

honestly think best strategy is if you're 200-300 spins deep with no feature just move on. i've wasted too much money chasing features that either never came or paid nothing when they did. not worth it fr

think its getting pretty clear curacao is cheap license for operators with min player prot. some good casinis have it but the license itself provides almost nothing when disputes arise

curacao license seems pretty pointless. what does it actually mean? is there anything that benefits players? would be interesting to get proper perspective on this from someone who handles complaints

okok got it but can we get back to topic tho?? original question was about shazam splitting withdrawals. anyone actually used them or should op just withdraw the $1k thats left and find different casino

ok sounds like overall this probably good change even tho bonuses get smaller. gonna wait few months and see how it actually plays out before making final judgment

appreciate the math breakdowns guys!! so i guess the question is whether casinos actually offer those 25-35% bonuses or just stop doing bonuses altogether for uk market

so the new ukgc rules finaly went live. 10x max wagering requirements and no more mixing sports and casino bonuses on one hand 10x is way better than the 40-50x we been seeing. but every casino gonna slash bonus percentages to compensate right? gonna be 20-30% match bonuses instead of 100%...

100% @queermysoul that's identity fraud please don't do that! If casino catches it mom could face real troubles. Not worth those $600 for sure

thats a harsh take but it is as it is review sites probably don't want to publish complaints from people who admit breaking laws to gamble. creates legal issues for them. still think casino shouldn't keep the balance tho

Reddit, honestly. Forums like this where there's no financial incentive to suppress complaints. Review sites that take casino advertising money will always have that conflict. They can't be too harsh on operators who pay their bills

they're ok. similar to wh and unibet. will limit you if you win consistently on sports but takes kinda longer than bet365 casino side is decent. nothing special but solid selection so take a ride freely

also had same issue with bet364 moved to pinnacle for serious betting and keep smaller account at william hill for casual stuff. pinnacle has best odds but casino selection is limited. if you want both sports and casino imo william hill or unibet are your best bets for uk

well yeah long term the house edge guarantees you lose. thats literally how casinos make money. only "winning" is entertainment value and maybe occasional lucky session you cash out from